An auto insurance policy amendment unique to GEICO recently came to the attention of Mike Najjar of Marcotte Law Firm, who chairs the Auto Section for the Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys (MATA). A Public Records request to the Division of Insurance confirmed that the amendment indeed was in effect - as of April 2011. Why should you care? In its most obvious manifestations, the endorsement: 1) shortens the statute of limitations on various coverages, including mandatory coverages; 2) allows the insurer to veto arbitration and limits the options for arbitration, even under coverages with which arbitration has been mandated; and 3) prevents suits to determine coverage where coverage is disclaimed until a judgment against the alleged insured has been rendered, which may rule out the declaratory judgment or reach and apply action because the time limit imposed by the contract may have run.
Further, the amendment appears to mark the end of arguably readable auto insurance policies. We have been at this a long time, and we still are not clear on what the endorsement is saying. It is written in GREICO. (couldn't resist.)
Even worse, we learned there are many unique and individualized amendments to what used to be a standard policy. All of this has taken place with no practitioners even knowing about it. So in case you thought you knew the statute of limitations on a PIP or uninsured motorist case, think again. If you thought you could bring a declaratory judgment action to determine coverage, think again.
For all we know at this stage, we are looking at the tip of the iceberg. MATA, at Attorney Najjar's direction, has sent someone to the Division of Insurance to get copies of all current amendments, and we will keep you informed. Some of the changes may be legal, some not. But who wants to go to court to find out?
We at Marcotte Law Firm have written to the Division of Insurance in part criticizing it for not widely informing people that decades of substantive law may have been altered by contract. We also have asked for hearings, with notice, on all proposed amendments. We do not expect an overwhelming welcome to our input.
At this point, we must emphasize that going with the lowest quote or auto insurance rate might not be the best choice for you and your family. The supposed drop in cost probably reflects a loss of coverage. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call Marcotte Law Firm. In the meantime, call your local representative and make sure he or she knows what the insurance companies are taking away from his or her constituents.





